Liberty: Freedom from restraint. The power of acting as one thinks fit, without any restraint or control, except from the laws of nature. Bouvier's Law Dictionary Free: Not bound to servitude; at liberty to act as one pleases. This word is put in opposition to slave. Bouvier's Law Dictionary
"
In a self-perpetuating move to take control of the Scholars for 911 Truth, Steven Jones, the man with the Solar Cookers, has fried the likes of Rick Siegel. The only man with a verifiable piece of evididence from that day. The war for 911 truth goes on in all quarters and takes no prisoners!
Yep, good ole Mr. Green Jeans has showed his evil face as a censor beyond all censors. Without warning or reason the Jones boys, with the smiley faced nod of the minister from Salt Lake have cut the 911 Eyewitness Rick Siegel from the Scholars for 911 Truth Forums. He is no longer a member and no longer in good standing.
All links to video have been cut on their sites and all video has been removed from their Google links.
Here is professor Steven Jones quoted about banning and censoring Rick Siegel:
"A member objected to Rick's postings as follows:
"How many times does 911EyeWitness (Rick S) get to break the rules
before he is sanctioned? I've tried to give him the benefit of the
doubt, but all this infighting is not helping.
911EyeWitness: I can see where "constructive criticism" might be good,
but I don't see anything constructive in your posts.
Here: www.ricksiegel.com/web/in...le&sid=125 Rick does a hit piece on
Dr. Jones. To what end? To attempt to elevate his own site at Dr.
Jones' expense? I see that he favors Dr. Fetzer's and Dr. Wood's
energy weapon idea." UserID = MS911
His suspension from the forum is temporary, and I agree with the
moderator who took this action since Rick S clearly violated the rules
of the forum and had an objection raised by another member of
Scholars. He was NOT kicked out from membership of the Society (an
action which Jim F took against previous member David Hawkins, I
understand, contrary to my wishes.)"
As you can see Jones is using this episode to get back at Fetzer for some past transgression and using some thin-skinned users complaint, an idiotic complaint at that, to kick the only man with real evidence in hand from the Scholars forums. Jones has showed something here that is not nice at all. Who needs to write a hit piece when he performs so well?
The story in question is not a forum entry or complaint, it is a complaint that I have a site with information that offended another forum member. For stories on this site the 911Eyewitness is banned from the Scholars for 911 Truth. Not for an entry in the forum, an entry on my personal site. Censored on a forum because they don't like the personal site? This is real good Jones. You need NO hit piece you need to stop self-flagellating.
While I did not get enough time to grab the lastest thread, here is the one before it and another nice thread that you can see how predatory the forum has gotten. A "Flush Rick Siegel" thread.
These are zip files so right click, save and open on your computer. They are complete file saves with all graphics etc. The last thread and The Flush Rick Siegel thread. The latest thead was the even nicer than the first one here. I think you will agree that those who banned needed to be banned. Including Jones who did not know where the summary from one of his "peer reviewed" papers came from.
Copyright 2009 Rick Siegel
Website Design by: Baeva Corporate Web Site Design | Hosting by: WinYour Dot Com
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the articles posted on this website are distributed for their included information without profit for research and/or educational purposes only. This website has no affiliation whatsoever with the original sources of the articles nor are we sponsored or endorsed by any of the original sources.