Rick Siegel Prespectives on Freedom and Liberty

Obama's Message - Destroy the opposition before elections!

Obama and the western media have chosen to obfuscate the meaning of recent Taliban responses to Hillary Clinton's statement of reaching out to "moderate Taliban." The crux of the problem understanding it all is the Taliban are a political party not a terrorist organization.

Once you understand that the Taliban is an opposition political party. Taliban are like Republican while the US installed party is like Democrats. If you undertand that the Taliban position is clear. They would not talk to the US or NATO until they withdraw from their country. It is clear the US and other nations are foreign nationals on Afghani soil and only one political party has invited them.

To this end the US backed political party is doing everything it can to crush the opposition. Not through debate or at the electoral box but through bribery, coercion, murder and war. The US with its North Atlantic Treaty national armies are beefing up their efforts to destroy the Taliban political party before the August elections. The more that can be killed, maimed, intimidated, driven out of the country the better chance the US backed politiical party can get votes.

The largest problem facing the US plan is the people are turning to and helping the Taliban, which is turning into the people’s party. The bribe them not to shoot you warfare the US used in Iraq are not working in Afghanistan because the corruption of political officials is rampant.

The biggest problem the Afghani people face is the Western supported myth that Taliban is synonymous with Terror. It is not. While the US does not allow clandestine or public executions it carries them out – the Taliban did them in public. There was no heroin or opium production while the Taliban party ruled Afghanistan. As soon as the US came in and installed their political party they got production ramped to all time high within a year helping to fund covert US activities. The only problems are created by the press and applied to the subjective ideas western people have. The US has taken away the Afghani peoples right to self-determination outside of what they think (democracy). Democracy forced by the gun? That is their aim. Use American tax dollars to wipe out the political opposition, make it so uncomfortable to live that they leave, or bribe them so that their political party might win. Some display of freedom.

So back the Reuters article on Yahoo that twists the Taliban response to Clinton: Look, they have a spokesman, just like she is the Secretary of State and speak for the US, so does Mujahid. For one spokesman to claim she wants to speak to someone else more moderate is ludicrous and that is what Mujahid said, "They have to go and find the moderate Taliban, their leader and speak to them. This is a lunatic idea," He is their leader and spokesperson. What kind of fruitcake is Clinton? Clinton is the kind that will not admit that they want to destroy the political opposition that wants foreign troops to leave.

The mass media wants to call the Taliban, a political party backed by huge sections of Afghanistan, insurgents. Which to the US means those that want to topple the present political party, which was installed by the US. Alas, as the article referenced below shows not only has the majority of the country become Taliban party affiliates, but also even the capital has seen growth in Taliban presence. So the "insurgent"political party is trying to take back its nation and it has fought a dozen national armies to a standstill. So much is their will for their own land. Yet, the US still maintains it has the high moral imperative to wipe out the competing parties so its party will prevail. A dozen nations armies fighting "insurgents" to a draw after 9 years and the "insurgents" party is growing?

There are some things one need not understand. Afghanistan is an old country and the people have other traditions and mind sets. Trying to change them has been the downfall of every nation who tried. The English tried it at their zenith of power and failed - as did the Russians. Why are most of Europe and the US now trying to convert a desert tribal country to their idea of “good life?”

Reference